New findings reveal that micro-nukes, barometric bomb technologies, and other unfamiliar weapons took down the towers.
As the twenty-first anniversary of the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon approaches, there are still more questions than answers shrouding the events that occurred on that ominous September day. However, rest assured that far more planning went into the attacks than the official narrative states.
After thousands of hours of deep investigation and analysis into the events of 9/11, one thing is for sure, U.S. officials named the former WTC site Ground Zero for a reason. That’s because a Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Department of Energy study conducted after the attacks shows high trace levels of Tritium inside the WTC complex. Not only were abnormal levels of Tritium found inside the WTC complex but they were also found in the basement of WTC 6 and the stormwater system.
Definition of Ground Zero (ground ze·ro):
- The point on the earth’s surface directly above or below an exploding nuclear bomb.
What is Tritium, and why are the government findings important?
Tritium is used in nuclear weapons and has a distinct molecular signature rare in the ambient environment. Tritium enhances fission bombs by making them more efficient, which in turn, provides a higher yield.
To be blunt, the only way Tritium would be present in high trace levels is if at least one nuclear device detonated within proximity. It’s important to note that Tritium is extremely rare on Earth and, again, should not be found at levels reported to be 55 times higher than average. The increased levels of Tritium found on-site could also explain why many people in the area developed thyroid cancer in the months and years after the attacks.
Special Atomic Demolition Munitions were likely used in conjunction with other technologies to take out the towers’ central cores
Bad actors likely used Special Atomic Demolition Munitions (SADM) at the basement core of the Twin Towers and Building 7 to create a vertically directed blast forming a void for the remaining portion of the vaporized, pulverized, and dustified building debris to fall into as a combination of exotic weapons and demolition charges detonated in perfect succession.
Not only would United States government-made XM129 and XM159 nuclear demolition charges vaporize the cores of the buildings, but the nuclear munitions would also securely cleanse the secure bunker facility located underneath the WTC complex, killing two birds with one stone.
The SADM was developed during the Cold War and was intended to be used both offensively and defensively. These are nuclear demolition devices that result in a one kiloton blast, which is equal to 1000 tons of TNT. These munitions weigh approximately 50-70 pounds depending on the model and are configurated with remote detonators called a Field Wire Remote Control System that allows for detonation in an unassailable fashion.
To be clear, I am not saying that micronukes were solely responsible for bringing down the towers. There were other advanced weapons in play that day, including shoulder-fired missiles launched from the Woolworth Building, as mentioned in news broadcasts and the 9/11 Commission Report.
Wargaming out the scenario, it is viable that attackers planted micro-nukes at the base of Towers 1 and 2 and at the bottom of building 7. Presumably, three backpack-sized devices would have likely been placed roughly 50-80 feet below street level, somewhere in the basements of the buildings or subway access tunnels.
A high-yield, strategically positioned, and directed thermonuclear explosion would also explain numerous videos and eyewitness reports claiming explosions occurred in the basement and lobby of the towers before the reported plane strikes.
Traces of nano-thermite were found in WTC dust samples collected after the September 2001 attacks
Independent investigators working with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth concluded that Nano-thermite was used in the attack and was present in dust samples collected from Ground Zero. Nano-thermite can evaporate steel and could explain images that show sheer angled cuts on the columns of the main towers after the attack.
Evidence suggests that attackers used classified barometric bomb technology to carry out the 2001 WTC attack
Evidence shows that advanced barometric bomb technology derived from the ultra-secret U.S. Nuclear Weapons Program was also deployed in the attack. This technology incorporates classified trigger mechanisms that operate in a free air environment when gaseous elements that would form into a yellowish-brown colored combustible mixture using aluminum silicate red oxide and other ingredients are charged via a directed energy pulse. Upon activation of the device, gases would have surrounded and permeated the air around key structural columns on all floors before being triggered by a specific high-voltage pattern in which the element combination is responsive. This element of the attack could also explain controversial work done by Dr. Judy Wood that suggests a space-based directed energy weapon dustified the towers.
One bomb specialist, who wanted to remain anonymous for obvious reasons, testifies on the video to the existence of this technology.
The high-voltage pattern “produces sort of a stairway pattern in the molecular structure of the cloud. Part of that pattern is a hydro-dynamic power generator, energy source, permeating the cloud which is then energized with another energy source and then is detonated,” said the specialist. “This causes the cloud itself to explode in such a fashion that if the cloud is circulating around the pillar — then it crushes the pillar from all sides and turns that pillar literally to dust and leaves only the rebar behind. So if you’ve got this cloud permeating all the way around the first floor, wherever it is, anything within its path gets crushed, imploded, to dust instantaneously. And when that happens of course there is nothing left to hold up the upper floors above, so bang, they come down like a pancake.”
This also exemplifies why an eyewitness by the name of Kenneth Summers, who was in the lobby of Tower 2 at the time, actually saw such a gas-like substance mixing with the air just a tenth of a second before the witness was blown back out the lobby doors. Kenneth Summers told NBC in an interview following the attack what he saw just before being ejected from the lobby by a massive explosion.
Assuring Summers’ testimony, the New York Times reported:
“Mr. Summers, a technical analyst for Empire Blue Cross, had taken the 5:22 a.m. train from Bay Shore into the city just like any workday that Tuesday and had been at his desk for more than an hour when he decided to go downstairs to mail a letter. It was just as he stepped outside that a plane crashed into the building… To escape the falling debris, he turned around and was inside a revolving door when he noticed the lobby fill with a yellowish haze.”
Keep in mind that this very same technology was “used to take down a high-rise apartment building in downtown Beirut… in 1984,” according to former Pyrotronics-Hercules bomb specialist Michael Riconosciuto, who also identified the technology’s signature in the Oklahoma City Bombing at the Alfred P. Murrah Building on April 19, 1995.
Eyewitness reports of bombs
On 9/11, there is no doubt that numerous bombs were detonated inside the WTC complex. This fact can not be disputed and is documented in hundreds of videos and backed up by many eyewitness testimonies, including highly credible first responders and firefighters.
The ground shook
Seismic readings from that day indicate that at least three large man-made explosions, possibly nuclear by signature, took place underground inside the WTC complex. The seismic wave pattern started in one abrupt motion, resembling an atomic signature.
Could these abrupt seismic waves be the actual blasts that took out the cores of buildings 1, 2, and 7? Is this what the U.S. government has been hiding all along?
After all, why do you think the 9/11 Memorials resemble functional nuclear cooling pools? Just some food for thought.
More from Politics
New York Legislation will vote on “indefinate detention of unvaccinated,” claims former congressional candidate
Shepard Ambellas | Twitterland on Sunday, claiming that the New York Legislation will vote on whether authorities can detain the …
Chilling realization: We are currently unwilling participants in a live “DARK WINTER” exercise that can only end one way
Shepard Ambellas | U.S government officials and roleplayers from multiple organizations and agencies conducted a live bioterrorism exercise dubbed DARK …
House bill aims to blackmail businesses with fines up to $700k for failing to terminate the unvaccinated
Shepard Ambellas | The Biden Administration is pulling no punches and plans to impose heavy fines on businesses refusing to …